tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1566606152366187003.post1699524973759048916..comments2024-03-22T14:05:05.212-04:00Comments on Czabe.com: Wake Me When It's OverCzabehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12420874855933163339noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1566606152366187003.post-88437384447954430552009-04-05T21:48:00.000-04:002009-04-05T21:48:00.000-04:00The layout was bad at Ford Field and the camera an...The layout was bad at Ford Field and the camera angles sucked, but I don't feel that all dome setups are bad because of that. The regional final at Phoenix seemed to have the normal camera angles and such...the crowd just wasn't there. The regional final at Indy also seemed to be fairly normal. I do not recall any confused commentary from the CBS gang either. My only issue with the NCAA using domes is that it should be reserved for the Final Four round, if nothing else just to reflect how special it is to reach that level of the tournament. I recall exciting finals at the old RCA Dome, the Georgia Dome, the Superdome, and the San Antonio Dome that had great crowds, good camera work, and intelligent court layout. I know the NCAA is two-faced about money and athletes (and has been for some time...BCS...)but the dome setup appeals to the free market supporter in me. If people are willing to fill the seats at Ford Field knowing that the players will be mere ants, if nothing else just to say they went, then why not? Why artificially cap the interest in the game? Let the economy work...if enough people stop going to domes because the layout sucks and the view sucks, I'm sure the NCAA will come to the obvious conclusion that a smaller venue with higher ticket prices to increse revenue may be a better option. Until then, laissez faire. Love the morning show!Robitussunhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13634346774682218232noreply@blogger.com